Premium Domain Names for Sale at CrocoDom.com
Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
At a minimum they need technical people at the table just to tell them when some stupid idea isn’t even technically feasible.
I run into that even in my tiny corner of the world – and I’m dealing with STEM faculty.
I was at AT&T for some years while they tried to push the ITU-developed ISO protocol stack for networking, X.400 messaging, X.500 directory services. The assumption was since they came out of ITU they’d be adopted in short order and this TCP/IP stuff was a temporary thing. We see how that went.; Rough consensus & running code FTW…
I was at AT&T for some years while they tried to push the ITU-developed ISO protocol stack for networking, X.400 messaging, X.500 directory services. The assumption was since they came out of ITU they’d be adopted in short order and this TCP/IP stuff was a temporary thing. We see how that went.; Rough consensus & running code FTW…
I was at AT&T for some years while they tried to push the ITU-developed ISO protocol stack for networking, X.400 messaging, X.500 directory services. The assumption was since they came out of ITU they’d be adopted in short order and this TCP/IP stuff was a temporary thing. We see how that went.; Rough consensus & running code FTW…
Old quote: (I forget who said it)
“If the OSI developers are messaging each other, it’s probably over TCP/IP.”
“At a minimum they need technical people at the table just to tell them when some stupid idea isn’t even technically feasible.”
You’ve just put your finger on it. The politicians don’t *want* somebody telling them, “No, you can’t do that.” They don’t care about technical feasibility.
The UN is, in principle, about united humanity, but in practice, it’s a power grab. Expect much borking.
“United humanity” has always been exclusively about consolidating power – and thus control – at the top.
How could it be anything else? It’s just the west’s version of the Global Communism propaganda.
This blurb in the synopsis sent chills down my spine:
and making the internet trustworthy “by introducing accountability criteria for discrimination and misleading content.”
Ok….exactly who all is this compact between…and how much power of enforcement does this actually have on the individual?
Who the fsck is the US to decide what is “misleading”?
We’ve already found that many people purged during covid, were later found to be of sound mine and in many cases were right in their ascertations tha
We’ve already found that many people purged during covid, were later found to be of sound mine and in many cases were right in their ascertations that went against the grain of the accepted narrative of the day….that often resulted in policies that were govt. enforced
We’ve already found that many people purged during covid, were later found to be of sound mine and in many cases were right in their ascertations that went against the grain of the accepted narrative of the day….that often resulted in policies that were govt. enforced
I’m sure you can offer some examples.
I’m sure you can offer some examples.
Well, sure…
There is NO way that the virus came from the china lab….(turns out there’s decent evidence that it may have done just that).
You MUST wear a mask any mask to prevent disease spread and catching the virus(if it wasn’t a well fitter N95 type mask, it did you and other NO good at preventing disease).
There is NO danger at all from the vaccine…(turns out there were, potential heart problem, especially in younger men).
This is a “true” vaccine (even though
When I asked for examples, I was hoping that I’d get some relevant links (preferably to non-loony pages), not just a list of things you think people said.
We’ve had a lot of things that were “well known” throughout history. A lot of these things turned out to be bogus, wrong, and just bullshit being repeated over and over until people actually thought it’s valid information.
My favorite example in this context is the “meat pores” [steakperfection.com]. That you should quickly expose meat to high temperatures to “close the pores”. Meat has no pores. But try to get that information through to people who have been told that myth over and over and over again.
So yes, “everyone knows it”
I can’t recall anyone saying any of these statements. It also would be quite stupid to say this, based on the wast experience we have with vaccines.
What MIGHT have been said was, and consider what was known at the time, so you can add a “with what we know so far” condition to all of these:
– It is unlikely it originated in a lab / it does not look man made.
– Wearing a mask will limit the spread of the virus (as in, you wearing a surgical mask, will stop most droplets from you hitting other people. That’s why
There is NO way that the virus came from the china lab….(turns out there’s decent evidence that it may have done just that).
There is NO way that the virus came from the china lab….(turns out there’s decent evidence that it may have done just that).
Liar. It remains true that a preponderance of the evidence suggests it was natural. A preponderance is not all though, and that has always been acknowledged.
You MUST wear a mask any mask to prevent disease spread and catching the virus(if it wasn’t a well fitter N95 type mask, it did you and other NO good at preventing disease).
You MUST wear a mask any mask to prevent disease spread and catching the virus(if it wasn’t a well fitter N95 type mask, it did you and other NO good at preventing disease).
Liar. Any physical obstruction of droplets presents as a data point in the transmissability spectrum.
No mask is completely ineffective. That’s a simple matter of physics. Usefully effective is another metric.
That was always known, even as the transmissibility error bars were tightened.
There is NO danger at all from the vaccine…(turns out there were, potential heart problem, especially in younger men).
There is NO danger at all from the vaccine…(turns out there were, potential heart problem, especially in younger men).
Liar. Nobody every claimed that the vaccine had zero risk. But the
then we technical people will do like we did for the ITU crap, ignore them
“At a minimum they need technical people at the table just to tell them when some stupid idea isn’t even technically feasible.”
You’ve just put your finger on it. The politicians don’t *want* somebody telling them, “No, you can’t do that.” They don’t care about technical feasibility.
“At a minimum they need technical people at the table just to tell them when some stupid idea isn’t even technically feasible.”
You’ve just put your finger on it. The politicians don’t *want* somebody telling them, “No, you can’t do that.” They don’t care about technical feasibility.
In a previous life I worked for a company that was being forced by the Government to immediately disconnect and separate a handful of operating sites from the singular global network due to security mandates. After a few days of contracts being suspended and the business starting to feel the pinch, a consultant chimed in and said “just unplug the damn thing so we can get back to work.”
I then calmly proceeded to inform those who don’t care about technical feasibility exactly what would happen, hour by hour
“At a minimum they need technical people at the table just to tell them when some stupid idea isn’t even technically feasible.”
You’ve just put your finger on it. The politicians don’t *want* somebody telling them, “No, you can’t do that.” They don’t care about technical feasibility.
“At a minimum they need technical people at the table just to tell them when some stupid idea isn’t even technically feasible.”
You’ve just put your finger on it. The politicians don’t *want* somebody telling them, “No, you can’t do that.” They don’t care about technical feasibility.
Typical politician thinks this way:
“All things are possible if you have enough time; pass enough laws; hire enough consultants & sycophants; and spend plenty of other people’s money.”
At a minimum they need technical people at the table just to tell them when some stupid idea isn’t even technically feasible.
At a minimum they need technical people at the table just to tell them when some stupid idea isn’t even technically feasible.
If we haven’t voted the technically incompetent out at this point, then I’d say we’ve identified the group of voters responsible for maintaining the time-honored tradition of learning the hard way.
At a minimum, a Democracy needs competent voters. Everything else becomes rather irrelevant otherwise, as we’re experiencing.
At a minimum they need technical people at the table just to tell them when some stupid idea isn’t even technically feasible.
If we haven’t voted the technically incompetent out at this point, then I’d say we’ve identified the group of voters responsible for maintaining the time-honored tradition of learning the hard way.
At a minimum, a Democracy needs competent voters. Everything else becomes rather irrelevant otherwise, as we’re experiencing.
At a minimum they need technical people at the table just to tell them when some stupid idea isn’t even technically feasible.
At a minimum they need technical people at the table just to tell them when some stupid idea isn’t even technically feasible.
If we haven’t voted the technically incompetent out at this point, then I’d say we’ve identified the group of voters responsible for maintaining the time-honored tradition of learning the hard way.
At a minimum, a Democracy needs competent voters. Everything else becomes rather irrelevant otherwise, as we’re experiencing.
I know people fight the idea as elitist and wrong-think, but I would be interested in at least entertaining the idea of a simple ten question quizz before a vote. If a person can’t answer a few simple questions about the issues on the ballot? Maybe we don’t throw their vote out, but at least give it a lesser priority somehow.
And no, I’m not talking about a god damned physics and calculus exam. Politics is stupid simple once you break down the issues and get past the money involved. Issues should matter. The
At a minimum they need technical people at the table just to tell them when some stupid idea isn’t even technically feasible.
If we haven’t voted the technically incompetent out at this point, then I’d say we’ve identified the group of voters responsible for maintaining the time-honored tradition of learning the hard way.
At a minimum, a Democracy needs competent voters. Everything else becomes rather irrelevant otherwise, as we’re experiencing.
I know people fight the idea as elitist and wrong-think, but I would be interested in at least entertaining the idea of a simple ten question quizz before a vote. If a person can’t answer a few simple questions about the issues on the ballot? Maybe we don’t throw their vote out, but at least give it a lesser priority somehow.
At a minimum they need technical people at the table just to tell them when some stupid idea isn’t even technically feasible.
If we haven’t voted the technically incompetent out at this point, then I’d say we’ve identified the group of voters responsible for maintaining the time-honored tradition of learning the hard way.
At a minimum, a Democracy needs competent voters. Everything else becomes rather irrelevant otherwise, as we’re experiencing.
At a minimum they need technical people at the table just to tell them when some stupid idea isn’t even technically feasible.
At a minimum they need technical people at the table just to tell them when some stupid idea isn’t even technically feasible.
If we haven’t voted the technically incompetent out at this point, then I’d say we’ve identified the group of voters responsible for maintaining the time-honored tradition of learning the hard way.
At a minimum, a Democracy needs competent voters. Everything else becomes rather irrelevant otherwise, as we’re experiencing.
I know people fight the idea as elitist and wrong-think, but I would be interested in at least entertaining the idea of a simple ten question quizz before a vote. If a person can’t answer a few simple questions about the issues on the ballot? Maybe we don’t throw their vote out, but at least give it a lesser priority somehow.
When it comes to life experience, the average 18-year old voter is an untrained monkey by comparison to the average tax-paying voter who’s been running in that rat race for a decade or more.
Would be a hell of a lot easier to raise the voting age to 21. Or even 25. Politics demands a bit of common sense derived from real life experience, and not that delusional shit they’re selling on college campuses.
At a minimum they need technical people at the table just to tell them when some stupid idea isn’t even technically feasible.
If we haven’t voted the technically incompetent out at this point, then I’d say we’ve identified the group of voters responsible for maintaining the time-honored tradition of learning the hard way.
At a minimum, a Democracy needs competent voters. Everything else becomes rather irrelevant otherwise, as we’re experiencing.
I know people fight the idea as elitist and wrong-think, but I would be interested in at least entertaining the idea of a simple ten question quizz before a vote. If a person can’t answer a few simple questions about the issues on the ballot? Maybe we don’t throw their vote out, but at least give it a lesser priority somehow.
When it comes to life experience, the average 18-year old voter is an untrained monkey by comparison to the average tax-paying voter who’s been running in that rat race for a decade or more.
Would be a hell of a lot easier to raise the voting age to 21. Or even 25. Politics demands a bit of common sense derived from real life experience, and not that delusional shit they’re selling on college campuses.
At a minimum they need technical people at the table just to tell them when some stupid idea isn’t even technically feasible.
If we haven’t voted the technically incompetent out at this point, then I’d say we’ve identified the group of voters responsible for maintaining the time-honored tradition of learning the hard way.
At a minimum, a Democracy needs competent voters. Everything else becomes rather irrelevant otherwise, as we’re experiencing.
I know people fight the idea as elitist and wrong-think, but I would be interested in at least entertaining the idea of a simple ten question quizz before a vote. If a person can’t answer a few simple questions about the issues on the ballot? Maybe we don’t throw their vote out, but at least give it a lesser priority somehow.
At a minimum they need technical people at the table just to tell them when some stupid idea isn’t even technically feasible.
If we haven’t voted the technically incompetent out at this point, then I’d say we’ve identified the group of voters responsible for maintaining the time-honored tradition of learning the hard way.
At a minimum, a Democracy needs competent voters. Everything else becomes rather irrelevant otherwise, as we’re experiencing.
At a minimum they need technical people at the table just to tell them when some stupid idea isn’t even technically feasible.
At a minimum they need technical people at the table just to tell them when some stupid idea isn’t even technically feasible.
If we haven’t voted the technically incompetent out at this point, then I’d say we’ve identified the group of voters responsible for maintaining the time-honored tradition of learning the hard way.
At a minimum, a Democracy needs competent voters. Everything else becomes rather irrelevant otherwise, as we’re experiencing.
I know people fight the idea as elitist and wrong-think, but I would be interested in at least entertaining the idea of a simple ten question quizz before a vote. If a person can’t answer a few simple questions about the issues on the ballot? Maybe we don’t throw their vote out, but at least give it a lesser priority somehow.
When it comes to life experience, the average 18-year old voter is an untrained monkey by comparison to the average tax-paying voter who’s been running in that rat race for a decade or more.
Would be a hell of a lot easier to raise the voting age to 21. Or even 25. Politics demands a bit of common sense derived from real life experience, and not that delusional shit they’re selling on college campuses.
No. This “raise the voting age” bullshit is a Republican wet dream in this country, and I’d imagine a “conservative” wet dream elsewhere because it would stop progress dead. What do you do when the 18 year olds reach 21? Raise the age again?
Which is why I think the idea of a test is less egregious than raising the voting age. Just because people disagree with your conclusions it doesn’t mean they need excluded from the conversation.
I’m between the boomers and the zoomers. I’ve felt the age divide pretty sev
When it comes to life experience, the average 18-year old voter is an untrained monkey by comparison to the average tax-paying voter who’s been running in that rat race for a decade or more.
Would be a hell of a lot easier to raise the voting age to 21. Or even 25. Politics demands a bit of common sense derived from real life experience, and not that delusional shit they’re selling on college campuses.
No. This “raise the voting age” bullshit is a Republican wet dream in this country, and I’d imagine a “conservative” wet dream elsewhere because it would stop progress dead. What do you do when the 18 year olds reach 21? Raise the age again?
When it comes to life experience, the average 18-year old voter is an untrained monkey by comparison to the average tax-paying voter who’s been running in that rat race for a decade or more.
Would be a hell of a lot easier to raise the voting age to 21. Or even 25. Politics demands a bit of common sense derived from real life experience, and not that delusional shit they’re selling on college campuses.
When it comes to life experience, the average 18-year old voter is an untrained monkey by comparison to the average tax-paying voter who’s been running in that rat race for a decade or more.
Would be a hell of a lot easier to raise the voting age to 21. Or even 25. Politics demands a bit of common sense derived from real life experience, and not that delusional shit they’re selling on college campuses.
No. This “raise the voting age” bullshit is a Republican wet dream in this country, and I’d imagine a “conservative” wet dream elsewhere because it would stop progress dead. What do you do when the 18 year olds reach 21? Raise the age again?
No. I would hope they would grow a fucking brain and an ability to think for themselves by age 21, instead of listening to people who automatically assume that raising the voting age is some kind of “conservative wet dream”. It’s certainly a conservative thing alright, I’ll give you that. But you should be asking yourself why is it that a LOT of liberals eventually mature into conservatives once they start earning real money they don’t want to give away in the next social experiment? Why is it that lib
When it comes to life experience, the average 18-year old voter is an untrained monkey by comparison to the average tax-paying voter who’s been running in that rat race for a decade or more.
Would be a hell of a lot easier to raise the voting age to 21. Or even 25. Politics demands a bit of common sense derived from real life experience, and not that delusional shit they’re selling on college campuses.
No. This “raise the voting age” bullshit is a Republican wet dream in this country, and I’d imagine a “conservative” wet dream elsewhere because it would stop progress dead. What do you do when the 18 year olds reach 21? Raise the age again?
No. I would hope they would grow a fucking brain and an ability to think for themselves by age 21, instead of listening to people who automatically assume that raising the voting age is some kind of “conservative wet dream”. It’s certainly a conservative thing alright, I’ll give you that. But you should be asking yourself why is it that a LOT of liberals eventually mature into conservatives once they start earning real money they don’t want to give away in the next social experiment? Why is it that liberals are so hell-bent against raising the voting age? Maybe because liberal votes would be lost to maturity and common sense? Yup. Childishly obvious when you think about it.
When it comes to life experience, the average 18-year old voter is an untrained monkey by comparison to the average tax-paying voter who’s been running in that rat race for a decade or more.
Would be a hell of a lot easier to raise the voting age to 21. Or even 25. Politics demands a bit of common sense derived from real life experience, and not that delusional shit they’re selling on college campuses.
No. This “raise the voting age” bullshit is a Republican wet dream in this country, and I’d imagine a “conservative” wet dream elsewhere because it would stop progress dead. What do you do when the 18 year olds reach 21? Raise the age again?
When it comes to life experience, the average 18-year old voter is an untrained monkey by comparison to the average tax-paying voter who’s been running in that rat race for a decade or more.
Would be a hell of a lot easier to raise the voting age to 21. Or even 25. Politics demands a bit of common sense derived from real life experience, and not that delusional shit they’re selling on college campuses.
When it comes to life experience, the average 18-year old voter is an untrained monkey by comparison to the average tax-paying voter who’s been running in that rat race for a decade or more.
Would be a hell of a lot easier to raise the voting age to 21. Or even 25. Politics demands a bit of common sense derived from real life experience, and not that delusional shit they’re selling on college campuses.
No. This “raise the voting age” bullshit is a Republican wet dream in this country, and I’d imagine a “conservative” wet dream elsewhere because it would stop progress dead. What do you do when the 18 year olds reach 21? Raise the age again?
No. I would hope they would grow a fucking brain and an ability to think for themselves by age 21, instead of listening to people who automatically assume that raising the voting age is some kind of “conservative wet dream”. It’s certainly a conservative thing alright, I’ll give you that. But you should be asking yourself why is it that a LOT of liberals eventually mature into conservatives once they start earning real money they don’t want to give away in the next social experiment? Why is it that liberals are so hell-bent against raising the voting age? Maybe because liberal votes would be lost to maturity and common sense? Yup. Childishly obvious when you think about it.
This is the second time in a week some borderline thinking has lead to someone believing I’m arguing from the position of being a youth myself just because I don’t love conservatism. I’m almost fifty. Wrong assumption.
“Kids” as you call them are smarter than you think. Again, disagreeing with conservative “values” like rolling back human rights and shitting on liberals isn’t a sign of a lack of maturity so much as a sign that they haven’t mentally declined to the point where they cling to the past and hope
I don’t necessarily disagree with your points… But certainly, from the devil’s advocate position, you can see that it’s problematic to not give legal adults a say in governance that directly affects, and indeed, could directly target them?
I don’t necessarily disagree with your points… But certainly, from the devil’s advocate position, you can see that it’s problematic to not give legal adults a say in governance that directly affects, and indeed, could directly target them?
Sorry, but even the devil’s advocate position here is bullshit. Legal adults are prohibited from buying alcohol until age 21, and we generally don’t rent cars to them either. I really don’t think we need to go over the singular obvious reason for that (immaturity validated with statistical fact), but I can assure you it applies to politics as well.
The 18-year old hasn’t even escaped the spoiled comfort of a campus cry closet. As a taxpayer, I fucking DEMAND that ignorance gain a few years of experience a
Sorry, but even the devil’s advocate position here is bullshit.
Sorry, but even the devil’s advocate position here is bullshit.
Uh, no, it’s not.
Legal adults are prohibited from buying alcohol until age 21, and we generally don’t rent cars to them either.
Legal adults are prohibited from buying alcohol until age 21, and we generally don’t rent cars to them either.
Perfect example of why they must have a right to vote.
That is a law targeting them.
I really don’t think we need to go over the singular obvious reason for that (immaturity validated with statistical fact), but I can assure you it applies to politics as well.
I really don’t think we need to go over the singular obvious reason for that (immaturity validated with statistical fact), but I can assure you it applies to politics as well.
And I’m sure we don’t need to go over historical examples of people coming up with stupid fucking reasons to disenfranchise people who may not politically agree with them.
The 18-year old hasn’t even escaped the spoiled comfort of a campus cry closet. As a taxpayer, I fucking DEMAND that ignorance gain a few years of experience and maturity before blindly voting to affect MY reality and future. Every other taxpayer should too.
The 18-year old hasn’t even escaped the spoiled comfort of a campus cry closet. As a taxpayer, I fucking DEMAND that ignorance gain a few years of experience and maturity before blindly voting to affect MY reality and future. Every other taxpayer should too.
I’m not terribly sure you have either. As a larger taxpayer than you, I think we should deprive you of your vote.
The 18-year old hasn’t even escaped the spoiled comfort of a campus cry closet. As a taxpayer, I fucking DEMAND that ignorance gain a few years of experience and maturity before blindly voting to affect MY reality and future. Every other taxpayer should too.
I’m not terribly sure you have either. As a larger taxpayer than you, I think we should deprive you of your vote.
The 18-year old hasn’t even escaped the spoiled comfort of a campus cry closet. As a taxpayer, I fucking DEMAND that ignorance gain a few years of experience and maturity before blindly voting to affect MY reality and future. Every other taxpayer should too.
The 18-year old hasn’t even escaped the spoiled comfort of a campus cry closet. As a taxpayer, I fucking DEMAND that ignorance gain a few years of experience and maturity before blindly voting to affect MY reality and future. Every other taxpayer should too.
I’m not terribly sure you have either. As a larger taxpayer than you, I think we should deprive you of your vote.
Assuming? I see the delusion is strong with this one. How about you prove to me you’re actually a parent first. Then you can comment on the maturity and common sense that only comes from being far more than a spoiled-ass customer of a capitalist system, which defines the overwhelming majority of 18-20 year olds.
Common Sense will deprive you of your delusions rather quickly. It’s called millions of parents agreeing with me. Rest assured the idea to raise the voting age, is a proven valid one for a reaso
Politics affects how we deal with reality as populations. It continues to astound that so many people think this means politics affects reality itself.
Humanity has an unending supply of greed, stupidity, arrogance, and short-sightedness.
It continues to astound that so many people think this means politics affects reality itself.
It continues to astound that so many people think this means politics affects reality itself.
The reality is, politics does affect reality. Politics affects things like wars, environmental policy, and more. People live and die because of political decisions. Animals live and die. It’s almost certain entire species have gone extinct due to political decisions. Land, water, and air have been changed because of politics. Even the Moon and some other extra-terrestrial objects have been change or destroyed because of political decisions.
To deny that politics changes reality itself is, well, to deny
I had hoped it was obvious I was referring to things like calling COVID a hoax, and other political positions clearly contradicted by solid evidence.
scientists told me I had to take vaccines and lock my self up, how well did that work out huh?
scientists told me I had to take vaccines and lock my self up, how well did that work out huh?
Can’t talk about you, but it worked great for me. Too bad it’s over.
scientists are also telling me I can’t eat meat or drive because supposedly the planet is burning up, and hows that going for you now huh?
scientists are also telling me I can’t eat meat or drive because supposedly the planet is burning up, and hows that going for you now huh?
Less good, as we speak we have about 100F outside, and we’ve had that for about a month now. And this is Central Europe, not Nevada. Can’t say I’m happy about it, but hey, my AC is working fine and I only need that planet another 20-30 years so I should be ok.
what this really means imo is that they will exclude the giant tech corporations who’s interestes arent alinged at all with a free open internet
what this really means imo is that they will exclude the giant tech corporations who’s interestes arent alinged at all with a free open internet
To be replaced by governments whose interests aren’t aligned at all with a free open internet? That hardly sounds better.
governents in modern democracies are at least in some way accountable, and in theory attempting to represent the interests of their people, corporations are motivated and duty bound to reap profits above all else.
so yes its better, its not perfect but its better
ICANN went off the rails a few years after it was created. After accomplishing its primary mission of opening up domain registrations, it lost its way. Despite the use of the word “Internet” in their name, they meet globally three times a year. recent places include Hamburg, DC, Cancun, Kuala Lumpur, The Hague, San Juan, Seattle, Montreal, Kobe, Barcelona, and Panama City. It has a “funded traveler” policy, paying hotel and $85 per diem for meals and travel, which cost it millions annually. It’s a good deal if you’re part of the community. ICANN uses its ability to create TLDs for any word in the dictionary, giving it a new revenue source. I don’t know what this current dispute is about, but seriously doubt it upset the Internet or ICANN’s operations to generate new sources of revenue to fund its travel.
ICANN went off the rails a few years after it was created. After accomplishing its primary mission of opening up domain registrations, it lost its way. Despite the use of the word “Internet” in their name, they meet globally three times a year. recent places include Hamburg, DC, Cancun, Kuala Lumpur, The Hague, San Juan, Seattle, Montreal, Kobe, Barcelona, and Panama City. It has a “funded traveler” policy, paying hotel and $85 per diem for meals and travel, which cost it millions annually. It’s a good deal if you’re part of the community. ICANN uses its ability to create TLDs for any word in the dictionary, giving it a new revenue source. I don’t know what this current dispute is about, but seriously doubt it upset the Internet or ICANN’s operations to generate new sources of revenue to fund its travel.
Huh? You do realize that ICANN is on the same side as APNIC and ARIN — that technical people need to be at the table.
Or did the Reading Comprehension Devil attack you?
Is there anything that is actually wrong in the GP’s post?
ICANN doesn’t have clean hands. The introduction of a policy of unlimited TLDs broke lots of assumptions — for example, the use of private domain names on LANs, but it did increase ICANN’s revenue.
The good thing about the UN is it gives a voice to a lot of smaller, less powerful countries.
The bad thing about the UN is it gives a voice to a lot of smaller, less powerful countries.
That isn’t actually how it works.
Those smaller voices are controlled voices by special interests. Their countries are so small that it’s fairly trivial for the Dutch or the US, or the English or the Chinese, to effectively “buy” the country through special interest groups.
We’re seeing a lot of that right now come to the surface with the re-alignment to a bipolar BRICS-centric world. The “bought” countries are tired of being under the thumbs of the US, specifically.
Given that BRICS stands for Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, I’m not surprised that China and Russia are trading US control for controlling themselves.
haz governance?
Dammit, I never have mod points when I need them!
Someone +1 this as funny for me, will ya?
Maybe thatâ(TM)s a huge part of the problem, that needs to be solved? Techies, like politicians and bureaucrats, are not somehow made out of finer clay than the rest us. They need to get used to it.
They do, however, sometimes have a _leeeetle_ bit more knowledge about whether something is actually physically possible to do. Which is kinda useful when making plans, no?
Not if it breeds holier than thou arrogance and contempt for the rest of society, ya?
I mean, sure, if you want your bridges to fall down because you won’t listen to the engineer because he’s snooty, that’s your call…
If you’re creating a body to oversee things like the construction codes for large dams, what’s the absolutely most critical group you want to have represented? The CIVIL ENGINEERS who can tell you what the codes need to be for the dam to, you know, not collapse at random. The Internet is no different.
I would take it further. The Internet is a success today because it was designed and created by technical people who did not consult with politicians, ambassadors or their many do-nothing committees.
We can’t have actual experts influencing decisions!
I know, right? That would be just like fighting in the War Room!
tech people will ignore the UN and do whatever they feel they should be doing.
politicians power grab will NOT work
Choosing between the ICANN and the UN to run the internet… it feels like an election in the US.
Quite frankly, if anyone put a gun to my head and said “ICANN or UN, choose!” all I could say is “fuck it, just pull that damn trigger”.
Principles shared by the various religious communities? Like the sharia-law loving Islamic community? Or the Christian Dominionist’s that also want to control what you can say and do? Come to think of it, there is a lot of shared attitude: the desire, shared by almost all religions, to control what the population says does and thinks. That type of control is what will evolve when the religious leaders, representing way more than half of the world’s population, gain control of the internet.
The UN is probably just trying to grab some power, but ICANN is not being a good example why someone else should have that power. That is a corrupt private company if there ever was one.
As I recall…”Give it over to the international community. Fuck the US! They aren’t some bulwark against tyranical governmenrs of the world partially controlling it!”
UN nowadays is almost always bad. US should pull out. What useful thing has the UN done in the past 40 years?
There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.
America’s Farmers Are Bogged Down by Data
Microsoft To Sell Off Activision Cloud Gaming Rights To Ubisoft in Bid for UK Approval
Coding is easy; All you do is sit staring at a terminal until the drops of blood form on your forehead.
source
Premium Domain Names:
A premium domain name is a highly sought-after domain that is typically short, memorable, and contains popular keywords or phrases. These domain names are considered valuable due to their potential to attract more organic traffic and enhance branding efforts. Premium domain names are concise and usually consist of one to two words or two to four individual characters.
Top-Level Domain Names for Sale on Crocodom.com:
If you are looking for top-level domain names for sale, you can visit Crocodom.com. Crocodom.com is a platform that offers a selection of domain names at various price ranges. It is important to note that the availability of specific domain names may vary, and it’s recommended to check the website for the most up-to-date information.
Contact at crocodomcom@gmail.com:
If you have any inquiries or need assistance regarding the domain names available on Crocodom.com, you can reach out to them via email at crocodomcom@gmail.com. Feel free to contact them for any questions related to the domain names or the purchasing process.
Availability on Sedo.com, Dan.com, and Afternic.com:
Apart from Crocodom.com, you can also explore other platforms like Sedo.com, Dan.com, and Afternic.com for available domain names. These platforms are popular marketplaces for buying and selling domain names. Each platform may have its own inventory of domain names, so it’s worth checking multiple sources to find the perfect domain name for your needs.
#PremiumDomains #DomainInvesting #DigitalAssets #DomainMarketplace #DomainFlipping #BrandableDomains #DomainBrokers #DomainAcquisition #DomainPortfolio #DomainIndustry #DomainAuctions #DomainInvestors #DomainSales #DomainExperts #DomainValue #DomainBuyers #DomainNamesForSale #DomainBrand #DomainInvestment #DomainTrading